An interesting read. Very interesting. Got me thinking. Check it out.
An articulate letter was forwarded to me today via email (planetshakersinsider @gmail.com)
It was described as an open letter to the ACC National Executive [AOG Australia’s top leadership], and was attributed to young pentecostal worship leader Ben Manusama (of Manifest Youth) – If someone can find the original source, I’d appreciate it – I couldn’t find it myself.
It clearly articulates some key points that have also been raised about Planetshakers leadership on this blog, as well as the wider pentecostal leadership in Australia and worldwide elsewhere in the light of Mike Guglielmucci’s fall, as well as the fall of Todd Bentley.
It went on to explain among other things, the causes and effects of “fallen” and/or misguided leaders. Using the example of Mike Gugliemucci and the circumstances surrounding his rise and the aftermath of his shocking revelation, Manusama described the dangerous path the Church is now treading.
“A person like Mike Guglielmucci is not born but created.
I say this not to negate Mike’s responsibility or guilt for his actions but to draw our attention to how the culture of the contemporary Pentecostal church has allowed and accommodated for somebody like Mike to thrive.
WHAT IS THIS CULTURE?
One of the strengths of Pentecostalism has always been its ability to become culturally relevant to all peoples – and particularly young people. This is seen in our ever evolving forms of communication, media, music and the content and delivery of our message. These things are important when they are the natural side effect of being creative human beings in a changing world, however when they become the mechanism by which we build the church there are dangerous consequences.
What began as a move to bring the church out of the dark ages and into the realm of popular culture has had devastating side effects:
- Praise and worship has become a music industry (complete with it’s very own rock stars),
- Preaching has become motivational speaking (with little expectation to know or engage with the text)
- and Ministry has become a desirable and lucrative career choice.
Against this backgrou
nd, the value system of church seems to have changed.
I came across an article by an American minister named Dutch Sheets. I am unfamiliar with his ministry but his response to the events surrounding Todd Bentley seem all too appropriate to our situation.
The following is a quote from him:
“We, the leaders of the charismatic church, have built on hype, sensation, innovation, programs, personality and charisma. This has produced:
- false movements;
- novice leaders— gifted but immature and untested;
- a deficient understanding of God’s word;
- the building of man-centered rather than kingdom- centered churches and ministries;
- competition rather than cooperation;
- humanistic, s
elf-centered Christians who don’t understand sacrifice and commitment;
- Christians without discernment; superstar leaders; a perverted and powerless gospel;
- prayerless and anemic Christians;
- a replacement of the fear of the Lord with the fear of man;
- and a young generation that is cynical of it all.”
As a young person in our movement I honestly believe that this almost summarizes the state of our predicament.
I look around and see so many insecure church leaders who are too eager to jump on trends and exploit new talent and ideas as a way to keep up with the Joneses/Houstons.
It is within this environment that a talented, charismatic, gifted, articulate, charming, yet-untested, son of a well respected preacher managed to not only slip through the process of accountability but then exploited the system to get to the top.
Our movement that seems to have become so obsessed with a man’s talent, gifting and ability to draw a crowd was the perfect environment for such a man to exploit. No matter what Mike’s motivations, regardless of the driving force behind his actions (whether he was psychologically sound or not), he has demonstrated that there is a ladder to be climbed and it can be done apparently with no help from the Holy Spirit.
Worse still, not only did he make a complete mockery of Pentecostal rhetoric but he was ultimately endorsed by the leaders of our denomination – which is you guys.
Even at the end there were churches (including my own) who were unsure about his ministry but finally accepted based on the endorsement from the national executive.
1) For a denomination that is supposed to be led by the Holy Spirit instantly one asks where was the discernment of our leaders? Is it too much to expect that our spiritual fathers and shepherds will be led by the Spirit to protect their flock? Granted everyone’s saying that he hid this from his own wife and family but surely God would try to forewarn and thus prevent such a catastrophic deception that has ruined so many lives.
2) What system of accountability allows such a man to get so far? Amidst the excitement over his ministry and his ability to draw a crowd – was there anybody in his life to challenge his behaviour? And if so, if someone actually knew even in part about his strugg
3) Who takes responsibility? In the official statements released so far – no one has taken ownership. Words like ‘illness’ and ‘professional help’ deflect attention from the real underlying cultural problems and the role played by leadership in allowing this to happen. What’s to prevent another Mike Guglielmucci from happening?les, why were measures not taken to limit his reach of influence until those struggles were resolved? Surely some of the reports coming out about his methods as youth pastor at Planetshakers City Church should have raised a red flag. Was everyone too quick to celebrate his role in growing the church, and too hesitant to question or check a rising star?
It just seems like it would be too easy for somebody else to come through and exploit it all over again.
I don’t think it’s enough for our leaders to say they don’t condone what has been done – this whilst separating themselves from ‘the man’ does not acknowledge their role in the greater problem. Nor is it enough for them to say they had no idea what was going on – that they didn’t know. It was your job to know (surely even just on a practical level regardless of your theology).
Just as a father is responsible for what happens to his kids, aren’t you in some way responsible for what happens to our generation?
My concern is that the next few weeks will be about damage control and no discussion or admission of the greater underlying issues.
We don’t expect for you guys to be perfect but we expect honesty and openness. Perhaps if our leaders were willing to be transparent about their weaknesses, we would be less inclined to hide ours.
4) What are you going to do to change it?
multitude of young people looking to you now. We’re hurt, confused, bleeding and angry.
You’ve spoken to us at meetings, conferences, youth alive retreats and through DVDs. Speak now.
You’re always so quick to let us know you’re leading us.
1) What happened to the discernment of leaders? Are our leaders QUALIFIED to lead? Based on what criteria?I agree wholeheartedly with Ben Manusama’s sentiments.
2) How did the lie slip through any accountability, and get so far? Was there any accountability to start off with?
3) Who will stand up and take responsibility?
4) What will happen to ensure this doesn’t happen again?
All reasonable and fair-minded questions.
What do you think?